What makes a classic a classic?

An ode to Chariots of Fire and thoughts about how we define a classic.

Joshua Poh
4 min readJun 12, 2019
Photo by Diego PH on Unsplash

“(Nagasawa) was a far more voracious reader than I, but he made it a rule never to touch a book by any author who had not been dead at least thirty years. “That’s the only kind of book I can trust,” he said.

“It’s not that I don’t believe in contemporary literature,” he added, “but I don’t want to waste valuable time reading any book that has not had the baptism of time. Life is too short.”

“What kind of authors do you like?” I asked, speaking in respectful tones to this man two years my senior. “Balzac, Dante, Joseph Conrad, Dickens,” he answered without hesitation.

“Not exactly fashionable.”

“That’s why I read them. If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking. That’s the world of hicks and slobs. Real people would be ashamed of themselves doing that. Haven’t you noticed, Watanabe? You and I are the only real ones in the dorm. The other guys are crap.

- Haruki Murakami — Norwegian Wood

Who can forget Murakami’s seminal words and dare-i-say-it, snobby Nagasawa’s declaration against trends of the times?

--

--

Joshua Poh
Joshua Poh

Written by Joshua Poh

Freelance writer and content marketer for B2B SaaS companies. More at https://www.joshuapohwrites.com/

No responses yet